Compare online casinos side by side
The same facts in the same rows: licence and register finding, verified markets, withdrawal statements, ID checks, fees, coins, games and bonus – for any two or three of the 100 Top 100 casinos. A missing value means “not documented yet”, never a negative finding.
- 100Top 100 casinos in Casino Battle
- 14written comparisons
- 12same-regulator pairs
Casino Battle – compare up to three of the 100 Top 100 casinos
Adds a row with each casino’s regulator-verified status in your country.
Choose two casinos to start. You can also add a casino from the Smart Finder or with “Compare” on any review.
How Casino Battle compares
- Same rows, same rules. Facts come from the Top 100 database: the regulator register, the casino’s binding terms and its own pages – each value labelled verified, “casino says” or third-party source, with the check date on the review or factsheet.
- Unknown is not worse. “Not documented” means we have no source for it. A row is marked as different only when the casinos have different documented values.
- No verdict. This tool does not declare one casino better – the Smarter Score already weighs the documented facts with one public method, and this tool never changes it.
- Your country. “Available” appears only where a regulator source confirms the brand for that market; everything else says what we found (restricted, licensed but not confirmed, not confirmed). It is not legal advice.
Written casino comparisons
Each page compares two reviewed casinos row by row and writes out where their documents differ. Pairs from the same regulated market come first in our selection because they compete for the same players.
BitStarz80Excellent
Roobet83ExcellentBitStarz vs Roobet
Same regulator: Curaçao Gaming Authority · 3 points apart- Withdrawal time: BitStarz states a target, Roobet a firm maximum
- Documented coins: 6 vs 11
- Roobet83Excellent
Shuffle86ExcellentRoobet vs Shuffle
Same regulator: Curaçao Gaming Authority · 3 points apart- Withdrawal time: Roobet states a firm maximum, Shuffle a share of withdrawals
- ID checks: may be required vs before first withdrawal
Betway85Excellent
LeoVegas95ExcellentBetway vs LeoVegas
Same regulator: Malta Gaming Authority · 10 points apart- Withdrawal time: Betway states a conditional time, LeoVegas a target
- Restricted countries in the terms: 97 vs 11
Mr Green91Excellent
888casino83ExcellentMr Green vs 888casino
8 points apart- Different regulators: Malta Gaming Authority vs Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner
- Withdrawal time: Mr Green states a typical time, 888casino a target
Guts86Excellent
Rizk83ExcellentGuts vs Rizk
Same regulator: Malta Gaming Authority · 3 points apartRead the comparison
MrQ90Excellent
Sky Vegas76Very GoodMrQ vs Sky Vegas
Same regulator: UK Gambling Commission · 14 points apart- Withdrawal time: MrQ states “most” withdrawals, Sky Vegas a typical time
Bally Casino90Excellent
Ladbrokes Casino83ExcellentBally Casino vs Ladbrokes Casino
Same regulator: UK Gambling Commission · 7 points apart- Withdrawal time: Bally Casino states a conditional time, Ladbrokes Casino a typical time
- Withdrawal cap: no fixed limit (stated) vs none published
- LeoVegas95ExcellentMr Green91Excellent
LeoVegas vs Mr Green
Same regulator: Malta Gaming Authority · 4 points apart- Withdrawal time: LeoVegas states a target, Mr Green a typical time
- Restricted countries in the terms: 11 vs 14
Vera&John87Excellent
Expekt92ExcellentVera&John vs Expekt
Same regulator: Swedish Gambling Authority · 5 points apart- Withdrawal time: Vera&John states a firm maximum, Expekt a typical time
- Withdrawal cap: ≈ USD 74,448 per month vs none published
Kansino78Very Good
TOTO Casino86ExcellentKansino vs TOTO Casino
Same regulator: Kansspelautoriteit · 8 points apart- Withdrawal time: Kansino states a typical time, TOTO Casino a conditional time
Efbet (Greece)90Excellent
NetBet (Greece)79Very GoodEfbet (Greece) vs NetBet (Greece)
Same regulator: Hellenic Gaming Commission · 11 points apartRead the comparison
Codere78Very Good
Marathonbet92ExcellentCodere vs Marathonbet
Same regulator: Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego · 14 points apart- Only Marathonbet publishes a withdrawal time
- LeoVegas95Excellent
BetMGM UK89ExcellentLeoVegas vs BetMGM UK
6 points apart- Different regulators: Malta Gaming Authority vs UK Gambling Commission
- Only LeoVegas publishes a withdrawal time
BetFlag91Excellent
Lottomatica88ExcellentBetFlag vs Lottomatica
Same regulator: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (ADM) – Italy · 3 points apart- Only BetFlag publishes a withdrawal time
Comparing crypto casinos? See the Top 20 crypto casinos – the Top 100 brands with documented crypto deposits.
How our comparisons work
Every comparison uses the same rows for both casinos. We read the facts from primary documents and mark where each one comes from.
- Licence and register
- Which regulator the casino names, and whether its domain or company appears in that regulator’s public register. See the regulators we track.
- Withdrawals
- The stated withdrawal time and what kind of statement it is (a firm maximum, a typical time or only a target), plus published caps and instalment clauses.
- ID checks (KYC)
- When the casino says it asks for documents, and whether it publishes specific triggers or only general wording.
- Fees and coins
- Casino withdrawal fees and the deposit methods and cryptocurrencies the cashier documents.
- Terms findings
- Clauses in the binding terms that can affect a payout, classified with one fixed list for every casino.
- Player protection
- Deposit, loss and session limits, self-exclusion and two-factor login, as the casino states them.
Why two Smarter Scores differ
The Smarter Score starts every casino at a neutral 50 and moves it only for facts we could verify: licensing and regulatory record, withdrawal and payment terms, terms findings, KYC transparency and player protection. A higher score means more is documented and checked in the casino’s favour – not that it suits you better. Two casinos with the same score can still differ on the rows that matter to you, which is why every comparison shows the facts, not just the numbers. The full rules and five worked examples are on the methodology page.
What to check first
- Is the casino licensed where you live? A licence from your own country’s regulator gives you a local complaints route. How to check a licence register.
- Is a withdrawal time a promise or a target? Only a firm maximum is a commitment. Casino withdrawal times explained.
- Which protection tools can you set yourself? Deposit limits and self-exclusion should be available before you play. Responsible gambling.
Questions about our comparisons
How do you compare two casinos?
Both casinos are read with the same locked methodology (Smarter Score 4.1): the regulator’s public register, the binding terms, the cashier and help pages. Each comparison puts the same facts in the same rows and names a difference only where both casinos have a documented value.
Do you say which casino is better?
No. The comparisons show where the documents differ and what is the same. Which difference matters depends on your country, your payment method and how you play.
Do you make test deposits or withdrawals?
No. Withdrawal times are the casinos’ own statements, labelled “casino says”. We record whether a time is a firm maximum or only a target, because a target is not a promise.
Why are there only 14 written comparisons?
A written comparison needs two reviewed casinos with enough verified facts to say something specific. 12 of the 14 pairs share a regulator, so they compete for the same players. For any other combination, Casino Battle at the top compares up to three of the 100 Top 100 casinos – every reviewed casino included.
Are bonuses or affiliate deals part of the comparison score?
No. Public offers appear as “casino says” information with their wagering terms, but the Smarter Score never reads offers, partner deals or player reviews.
Facts as of 29 Oct 2026. 18+ · How we make money